Senators Want
to Let Americans Visit and Spend Money in Cuba
BY TIM JOHNSON
Posted on Thu, May. 01, 2003
Miami Herald WASHINGTON -A bipartisan group of eight senators on Wednesday presented a bill that would open up Cuba to U.S. tourism and allow American citizens to spend dollars freely there.
If we allow more and free travel to Cuba, if we increase trade and dialogue,
we take away [Cuban leader Fidel] Castro's ability to blame the hardships of
the Cuban people on the United States, Sen. Michael B. Enzi, a Wyoming
Republican, told his colleagues.
Enzi labeled as deplorable a crackdown in Cuba since mid-March
that has seen some 75 pro-democracy activists and journalists arrested and sent
to jail for up to 28 years. But he said Castro would face a greater threat from
an onslaught of U.S. tourism than from the four-decade-old embargo.
Joining Enzi in co-sponsoring the bill were fellow Republicans Lincoln Chafee
of Rhode Island and Larry Craig of Idaho, and Democrats Max Baucus of Montana,
Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Mark Dayton of Minnesota, Jeff Bingaman of New
Mexico and Tim Johnson of South Dakota.
Meanwhile, in a blow to Cuban hopes of improving its economy, the European Commission
decided to shelve a bid by Cuba to join the so-called Cotonou Agreement, a trade
pact that offers economic assistance to more than 70 developing nations. The
move is one of the first concrete steps taken by any nation or bloc against
Cuba in an effort to pressure the government to roll back its recent wave of
repression.
A spokesman for the commission said it did not wish to remain silent in view
of the ''strong and grave deterioration of the political situation'' that had
taken place in Cuba recently.
He added that as long as there is no change in the situation, it should
be evident that the commission will have no reason to change its decision.
Membership in the Cotonou agreement has been eagerly sought by Cuba for years,
both for the practical economic benefits it would confer and because it would
send a symbolic message of acceptance as a partner in a worldwide economic organization
sponsored by the European industrial democracies.
By the same token, the suspension of consideration -- a step short of outright
rejection -- represents a real setback. It came on the eve of one of Cuba's
biggest political holidays, May 1, recognized in Cuba and elsewhere as a celebration
of the labor movement. Castro has promised to put millions of demonstrators
in the streets of Havana today to show support for the leadership.
On Capitol Hill, meanwhile, efforts to relax the U.S. embargo -- or even scrap
it altogether -- have surged since the late 1990s. Bipartisan legislators from
states with large agricultural industries eager to sell to Cuba have pushed
to suspend embargo provisions.
But Republican floor leaders, particularly House Majority Leader Tom DeLay,
backed by the White House, have derailed bills to relax the embargo for the
last three years, and vow to do so again this year.
The crackdown in Cuba triggered worldwide condemnation and chilled hopes of
U.S. agricultural and business leaders seeking to relax the U.S. embargo.
Those hopes had grown since late 2001, when the Castro regime started a spending
spree that has now amounted to about $170 million for U.S. foodstuffs. Such
cash purchases of agricultural goods from U.S. suppliers are allowed under three-year-old
trade reforms.
Existing restrictions block U.S. travel to Cuba unless citizens obtain Treasury
Department licenses or fall under exempt categories covering people like journalists,
diplomats and humanitarian workers. Violators receive fines that average around
$7,500.
This report was supplemented with material from Herald wire services